28.01.25...Untouchablity News.....अछूत समाचार.தீண்டாமை செய்திகள்.by Team சிவாஜி. शिवाजी .Shivaji.asivaji1962@gmail.com.9444917060.asivaji1961@gmail.com.facebook.sivajiyogatiruvannamalai.X.ShivajiA479023.
A common response to negative situations is to immediately think more and that creates a hurry in actions. Stopping whatever you are doing and creating a few thoughts of peace, positivity, and power at that time, helps in slowing down the thoughts and keeping them focused and free from hurry.
2● 🎁𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗗𝗮𝘆 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗠𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 & 𝗦𝗶𝗹𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 – The best way to slow down your thoughts in the entire day is to begin your day with a deep connection with mind. The Ocean Of Peace and Silence. In the morning our mind is very fresh and if we make it silent with meditation at that time, the whole day is influenced because of that and we hurry less and work more.
3● 🎁𝐑𝐞𝐟𝐥𝐞𝐜𝐭 𝐃𝐞𝐞𝐩𝐥𝐲 & 𝐑𝐞𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐬𝐞 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐈𝐧 𝐘𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐌𝐢𝐧𝐝 – We hurry when suddenly a situation comes in front of us, which expects more from us than we are used to. At such times, we feel there is very little time and we hurry. We need to instead go inwards and stretch time by being flexible and then begin our work again with a new timetable of tasks than our regular one. This will reduce our hurry.
4● 🎁𝗘𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 parents 𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗔 𝗙𝗲𝘄 𝗠𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 & 𝗧𝗮𝗸𝗲 their 𝗚𝘂𝗶𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲 – Sometimes, when we are at work or in our families and there are lots to do and there are many unfinished tasks and time deadlines, it’s good to link your mind and intellect with parents a guidance, which makes us stable and free from the hurry and it also makes our mind more organised and efficient.
5● 🎁𝐑𝐞𝐚𝐝 & 𝐋𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐧 𝐓𝐨 𝐎𝐧𝐥𝐲 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐈𝐬 𝐍𝐞𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐚𝐫𝐲 – One of the reasons our thoughts are more all the time and we also feel tired and hurried that, is that we begin our day with the newspaper and television and in the entire day think and discuss a lot about what others are doing, which is not necessary.
Most of our time will be wasted because of,
A.Television(visiting multiple times)
B.News paper.(Reading the same news which we have watched in TV)
3.Mobiles.(Repeatedly the same message is posted again and again)
4.Social Media(without use, or benefits celebrities vedeos are telecasted)
We need to reduce,avoid this and read, talk, and listen more positively and economically.
🎈🪆🎈🪆🎈🪆🎈🪆🎈
FIR filed after Dalit MLA says he was not allowed to open building in Bihar
The incident took place on Republic Day under Parsa Bazar police station in Patna; Bihar police lodges FIR under Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
File photo of Gopal Ravidas. | Photo Credit: Special Arrangement
CPI(ML) legislator Gopal Ravidas has lodged a complaint accusing locals of not allowing him to inaugurate a building of a government school because he belongs to a Scheduled Caste.
The incident took place on Republic Day (January 26, 2025) under the Parsa Bazar police station limits in Patna district of Bihar. Based on the complaint, police have registered a First Information Report (FIR) and imposed several sections of Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.
Kerala BJP signals generational shift with boost for women, Christian and SC/ST representation in leadership
BJP Kerala State president K. Surendran says party will have Muslims too in leadership positions
Updated - January 28, 2025 10:01 am IST - Thiruvananthapuram
BJP Kerala State president K. Surendran (centre) . File photo | Photo Credit: THULASI KAKKAT
The Bharatiya Janata Party’s (BJP) Kerala unit has signalled a generational change in leadership with a higher representation of women, youth, Christians, Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) and backward-class communities in top organisational posts from the booth level and upwards.
At a press conference in Thrissur on Monday (January 27, 2025), BJP State president K. Surendran said the party’s nominees for district and booth committee presidents trended towards a younger demographic. Mr. Surendran said the BJP would also have Muslims in leadership positions.
The court noted that the incident took place inside the dining room of the house of the complainant, which could not be considered a public space
The Kerala High Court has reiterated that for an offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the alleged act of intentional insult or humiliation must occur in a place within public view.
A Single judge bench of Justice G. Girish, observed: “For the applicability of Section 3(1)(x) of SC/ST POA Act, as it stood prior to the amendment of the year 2015, it has to be established that the intentional insult or intimidation to cause humiliation to a member of Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe should be at a place within public view. As far as the present case is concerned, since the incident admittedly took place in the dining room of the house of the petitioner, it is not possible to say that it so happened at a place within public view.”
The court was hearing a criminal revision petition against the acquittal of the accused in a case arising out of two related proceedings. The case originated from an incident reported in 2010. The police charged 15 individuals under multiple provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Sections 3(1)(x) and 3(1)(xi) of the SC/ST Act. The de facto complainant, Kamala, later filed a private complaint alleging the inclusion of two additional accused omitted from the police chargesheet.
Both cases were clubbed and tried together by the Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act. After evaluating the evidence, the Special Court acquitted all accused except two who were absconding. Dissatisfied, the de facto complainant filed a revision petition challenging the acquittal.
The petitioner alleged procedural errors by the Special Judge, arguing that the joint trial violated norms, and the testimony of the complainant, along with other prosecution witnesses, was unfairly deemed unreliable. Additionally, it was contended that the court erred in concluding that Section 3(1)(x) of the SC/ST Act did not apply, asserting that the offence’s location inside her house should not preclude its qualification as an act committed “in public view.”
Upholding the judgment of the Special Court, the High Court clarified that a location within “public view” necessitates a physical space where the public has access or could reasonably witness the occurrence. An incident occurring within a private home, particularly within a dining room, does not meet this criterion, as the space is inherently restricted to household members or invited individuals.
With regards the trial court conducting a joint trial, the HC observed: “the mere fact that the learned Special Judge ventured to pronounce a common judgment in these cases, cannot by itself be taken as a circumstance which would vitiate the proceedings. Needless to say that the challenge raised by the petitioner in the above regard is devoid of merit.” The court held that it was not possible to conclude that the joint trial conducted by the Special Judge had resulted in failure of justice.
The court noted many inconsistencies in the testimony of the complainant as well as the witnesses. Interestingly, It also found that the petitioner’s husband was arrested a week before the complaint was filed, accused in a murder attempt involving the 10th accused in this case. Further, her husband had been involved in abkari (illicit liquor) cases. The petitioner expressed suspicion that the named accused were responsible for implicating her husband in those criminal proceedings. This pointed to a possible ulterior motive behind lodging the complaint.
Given these observations, the court termed the evidence tendered by the complainant “shabby and unreliable”, and found no reason to interfere with the Special Court’s ruling.
Cause Title: Kamala E.P v Ummer and Others [CRL.REV.PET NO. 1575 OF 2017]
Appearance: For the Petitioner - Advocates Roy Chacko and P.S.George; For the State- Public Prosecutor Sangeetharaj N.R and For R1 TO R17- Advocates Jency Micheal, Sojan Micheal, V.S.Boban, Chacko Simon, Antony Robert DIias and Sivasankar
Celebrating Republic Day: We, the People of Bharat
While celebrating our constitution, the pious document for every Indian, it is time whatever commitments and guarantees have been given to Indian citizens are strictly enforced and implemented
We, the People of India i.e. Bharat—celebrate 76th Republic Day on January 26, 2025. It is celebrating our Constitution which came into force on this day 76 years ago. How was this longest document prepared within the shortest period of over two years and the changes it witnessed over the years—have a look.
The 299-member Constituent Assembly was constituted to draft Constitution for Independent India on August 29, 1947. This assembly assigned the task of drafting the Constitution to a team under the Chairmanship of Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar.
The Drafting Committee also comprised of other members like Alladi Krishnaswami Ayyar,N Gopalaswami Ayyangar, KM Munshi, Mohammad Saadulla, B L Mitter, DP Khaitan and BN Rau, who reviewed the draft text in the capacity as the Constitutional Advisor.
The Constituent Assembly or the drafting committee took 2 years, 11 months and 17 days to draft the Constitution holding 11 sessions over 165 days with 114 days dedicated on the Draft Constitution. The committee played a major role in ensuring the Constitution reflected India’s diverse cultural, social, and political fabric.
The Constituent Assembly of India headed by Dr Rajendra Prasad adopted the draft of the Constitution of India on November 26, 1949. The final version of the Constitution was signed on January 24, 1950, and it came into effect on January 26, 1950. This constitution is the longest written constitution among all written constitutions of sovereign nations. For example, the Constitution of United States of America has only seven Articles.
The original constitution of India began with the Preamble which read as “ We, the People of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign Democratic Republic and to secure to all its citizens—Justice, social, economic and political: Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship: Equality of status and of opportunity: and to promote among them all Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual and to promote among them all Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity of the Nation: In our constituent assembly this 26th of November, 1949, do hereby adopt, enact and to give to ourselves this constitution”.
This preamble was changed in the 42nd Constitutional amendment by the then central government led by Prime Minister Indra Gandhi in 1976 with the incorporation of words “Socialist, Secular”. The Constitution of India replaced the Government of India Act of 1935. India celebrates its Constitution Day on November 26 and Republic Day on January 26.
The Constitution of India adopted in 1949 originally had 395 articles, but the number of articles increased due to amendments, the very first amendment took place in 1951 when Jawahar Lal Nehru was the Prime Minister. The amendments of the Constitution go on since then as per situation.
For example–The reservation of seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies in India is provided under 106th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2023 means over 100 amendments have taken place in the Constitution. Article 368 of the Constitution itself permits amendments in the Constitution.
The most important part of the Constitution–Article 12 to 32 contained in Part III of the Constitution deal with Fundamental Rights. These are: Right to equality, including equality before law, prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth, and equality of opportunity in matters of employment.
These six fundamental rights–Right to equality fall under Article 14–18, Right to freedom (Article 19–22) Right against exploitation (Article 23–24),Right to Freedom of Religion (Article 25-28) Cultural and Educational Rights (Article 29-30), Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32).
The celebration of Republic Day knows no bounds for any patriotic Indian living anywhere in the world, but questions remain when it comes to rights and freedoms guaranteed to every Indian by the founding fathers of our constitution. And the questions are—has the constitution come to the rescue of the innocent people whose lives anti Indian take very easily. For instance in 1998, a day before Republic Day i.e. on 25th of January, 23 Kashmiri Hindus were massacred by the terrorists in Wandhama village in Kashmir. The list is endless. Where were the protectors of the Constitution—the rights and the freedoms when such incidents take place and precious innocent lives snatched for no fault of theirs?
Different Prime Ministers have overseen amendments during their tenures. Here is a summary of key amendments:
Jawaharlal Nehru (1947–1964)
Amendments: 1st to 17th
1st Amendment (1951): Restricted fundamental rights in the interest of public order and added the Ninth Schedule to protect laws from judicial review.
4th Amendment (1955): Restricted property rights and expanded the scope of state powers.
Lal Bahadur Shastri (1964–1966)
Amendments: None
Indira Gandhi (1966–1977, 1980–1984)
Amendments: 24th to 42nd, and 44th
Key Highlights:
24th Amendment (1971): Gave Parliament power to amend any part of the Constitution.
42nd Amendment (1976): Known as the “Mini Constitution,” it strengthened the central government and curtailed judicial review– it introduced changes like:
Addition of words “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” to the Preamble. Incorporating into the Constitution, the Fundamental Duties under Article 51A. Some duties have been specified for the people towards the nation.
Shifted several subjects from the State List to the Concurrent List.
44th Amendment (1978): Undid many provisions of the 42nd Amendment, protecting fundamental rights.
Morarji Desai (1977–1979)
Amendments: 43rd and 44th
Key Highlights:
Restored democratic values and reduced emergency powers.
Rajiv Gandhi (1984–1989)
Amendments: 52nd and 59th
Key Highlights:
52nd Amendment (1985): Introduced the Anti-Defection Law.
V. Narasimha Rao (1991–1996)
Amendments: 73rd and 74th
Key Highlights:
Empowered local self-governments through Panchayati Raj and Municipalities.
Atal Bihari Vajpayee (1998–2004)
Amendments: 86th and 91st
Key Highlights:
86th Amendment (2002): Made education a fundamental right for children aged 6-14 years.
Manmohan Singh (2004–2014)
Amendments: 92nd to 99th
Key Highlights:
97th Amendment (2011): Recognized cooperative societies in the Constitution.
99th Amendment (2014): Introduced the National Judicial Appointments Commission (later struck down).
Narendra Modi (2014–Present)
Amendments: 100th to 105th
Key Highlights:
101st Amendment (2016): Introduced Goods and Services Tax (GST).
105th Amendment (2021): Restored states’ rights to identify socially and educationally backward classes.
106th Amendment (2023): Reservation for women in Parliament and state assemblies.
Each amendment reflects the priorities and challenges faced by governments during their tenure.
Seven amendments were carried out under different regimes related to extension of reservation for SC/ ST like in 8th amendment in 1960, 23rd in 1969, 45thin 1980, 62nd in 1989, 79th in 1999, 95th in 2010 and 104th amendment in 2020 extending reservation for SC/ST for ten years in every such amendment.
The amendments in the constitution have been a continuous process since its enforcement with the changing situation like due to the introduction of technology. It is believed very first amendment in our constitution was on the basis on observations made by the Supreme Court while hearing some cases related to fundamental rights.
It may be mentioned Mehr Chand Mahajan’s tenure as a judge of Supreme Court of India from 1948 to 1954 and later as Chief Justice of India from January 4, 1954 to December 22, 1954 was marked by several landmark judgments that have had a lasting impact on Indian jurisprudence.
One of his most notable contributions was his focus on upholding fundamental rights. As a judge, he frequently emphasized the importance of balancing individual freedoms with societal welfare. His judgments often highlighted the principles of equity, justice, and good conscience, making him a key figure in shaping India’s post-independence legal framework.
One of his most impactful judgments was in State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (1951).
This case dealt with the issue of caste-based reservations in educational institutions. Champakam Dorairajan, a Brahmin woman, challenged the State of Madras’ order that reserved seats in government colleges on the basis of caste, which restricted her admission opportunities.
Judgment
The Supreme Court, with Mehr Chand Mahajan as part of the bench, struck down this reservation order, ruling that it violated Article 15(1) of the Indian Constitution, which prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. This judgment reaffirmed the constitutional principle of equality and ensured that no discriminatory practices could override fundamental rights. The judgment also exposed the need for affirmative action to uplift historically disadvantaged communities, leading to the First Amendment of the Indian Constitution (1951), which added Article 15(4), enabling the State to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes.
In another landmark judgment in a case regarding freedom of speech –Brij Bhushan vs State of Delhi (1950). The case revolved around the pre-censorship order issued by the Delhi government against the magazine organizer. The magazine challenged the restriction, claiming it infringed on their fundamental right to freedom and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian constitution. The Supreme Court struck down the pre-censorship order as unconstitutional, ruling that such restrictions were not in line with Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution and could not be justified under the reasonable restrictions provided in Article 19(2). The judgment was among the first to uphold freedom of speech as a fundamental right ensuring the autonomy and independence of the press in a democratic set up.
While celebrating our constitution, the pious document for every Indian, it is time whatever commitments and guarantees have been given to Indian citizens are strictly enforced and implemented. How can an ordinary citizen feel safe, enjoy freedom of speech and expression, have access to livelihood, good education and healthcare are some of the issues though guaranteed by the founding fathers of the constitution which need strict compliance from We, the people of India, which include the state also.
(For awareness purpose only)
Rising Kashmir > Celebrating Republic Day: We, the People of Bharat
Celebrating Republic Day: We, the People of Bharat
While celebrating our constitution, the pious document for every Indian, it is time whatever commitments and guarantees have been given to Indian citizens are strictly enforced and implemented
We, the People of India i.e. Bharat—celebrate 76th Republic Day on January 26, 2025. It is celebrating our Constitution which came into force on this day 76 years ago. How was this longest document prepared within the shortest period of over two years and the changes it witnessed over the years—have a look.
The 299-member Constituent Assembly was constituted to draft Constitution for Independent India on August 29, 1947. This assembly assigned the task of drafting the Constitution to a team under the Chairmanship of Dr Bhim Rao Ambedkar.
The Drafting Committee also comprised of other members like Alladi Krishnaswami Ayyar,N Gopalaswami Ayyangar, KM Munshi, Mohammad Saadulla, B L Mitter, DP Khaitan and BN Rau, who reviewed the draft text in the capacity as the Constitutional Advisor.
The Constituent Assembly or the drafting committee took 2 years, 11 months and 17 days to draft the Constitution holding 11 sessions over 165 days with 114 days dedicated on the Draft Constitution. The committee played a major role in ensuring the Constitution reflected India’s diverse cultural, social, and political fabric.
The Constituent Assembly of India headed by Dr Rajendra Prasad adopted the draft of the Constitution of India on November 26, 1949. The final version of the Constitution was signed on January 24, 1950, and it came into effect on January 26, 1950. This constitution is the longest written constitution among all written constitutions of sovereign nations. For example, the Constitution of United States of America has only seven Articles.
The original constitution of India began with the Preamble which read as “ We, the People of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a Sovereign Democratic Republic and to secure to all its citizens—Justice, social, economic and political: Liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship: Equality of status and of opportunity: and to promote among them all Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual and to promote among them all Fraternity assuring the dignity of the individual and the unity of the Nation: In our constituent assembly this 26th of November, 1949, do hereby adopt, enact and to give to ourselves this constitution”.
This preamble was changed in the 42nd Constitutional amendment by the then central government led by Prime Minister Indra Gandhi in 1976 with the incorporation of words “Socialist, Secular”. The Constitution of India replaced the Government of India Act of 1935. India celebrates its Constitution Day on November 26 and Republic Day on January 26.
The Constitution of India adopted in 1949 originally had 395 articles, but the number of articles increased due to amendments, the very first amendment took place in 1951 when Jawahar Lal Nehru was the Prime Minister. The amendments of the Constitution go on since then as per situation.
For example–The reservation of seats for women in Parliament and state assemblies in India is provided under 106th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2023 means over 100 amendments have taken place in the Constitution. Article 368 of the Constitution itself permits amendments in the Constitution.
The most important part of the Constitution–Article 12 to 32 contained in Part III of the Constitution deal with Fundamental Rights. These are: Right to equality, including equality before law, prohibition of discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex or place of birth, and equality of opportunity in matters of employment.
These six fundamental rights–Right to equality fall under Article 14–18, Right to freedom (Article 19–22) Right against exploitation (Article 23–24),Right to Freedom of Religion (Article 25-28) Cultural and Educational Rights (Article 29-30), Right to Constitutional Remedies (Article 32).
The celebration of Republic Day knows no bounds for any patriotic Indian living anywhere in the world, but questions remain when it comes to rights and freedoms guaranteed to every Indian by the founding fathers of our constitution. And the questions are—has the constitution come to the rescue of the innocent people whose lives anti Indian take very easily. For instance in 1998, a day before Republic Day i.e. on 25th of January, 23 Kashmiri Hindus were massacred by the terrorists in Wandhama village in Kashmir. The list is endless. Where were the protectors of the Constitution—the rights and the freedoms when such incidents take place and precious innocent lives snatched for no fault of theirs?
Different Prime Ministers have overseen amendments during their tenures. Here is a summary of key amendments:
Jawaharlal Nehru (1947–1964)
Amendments: 1st to 17th
1st Amendment (1951): Restricted fundamental rights in the interest of public order and added the Ninth Schedule to protect laws from judicial review.
4th Amendment (1955): Restricted property rights and expanded the scope of state powers.
Lal Bahadur Shastri (1964–1966)
Amendments: None
Indira Gandhi (1966–1977, 1980–1984)
Amendments: 24th to 42nd, and 44th
Key Highlights:
24th Amendment (1971): Gave Parliament power to amend any part of the Constitution.
42nd Amendment (1976): Known as the “Mini Constitution,” it strengthened the central government and curtailed judicial review– it introduced changes like:
Addition of words “Socialist,” “Secular,” and “Integrity” to the Preamble. Incorporating into the Constitution, the Fundamental Duties under Article 51A. Some duties have been specified for the people towards the nation.
Shifted several subjects from the State List to the Concurrent List.
44th Amendment (1978): Undid many provisions of the 42nd Amendment, protecting fundamental rights.
Morarji Desai (1977–1979)
Amendments: 43rd and 44th
Key Highlights:
Restored democratic values and reduced emergency powers.
Rajiv Gandhi (1984–1989)
Amendments: 52nd and 59th
Key Highlights:
52nd Amendment (1985): Introduced the Anti-Defection Law.
V. Narasimha Rao (1991–1996)
Amendments: 73rd and 74th
Key Highlights:
Empowered local self-governments through Panchayati Raj and Municipalities.
Atal Bihari Vajpayee (1998–2004)
Amendments: 86th and 91st
Key Highlights:
86th Amendment (2002): Made education a fundamental right for children aged 6-14 years.
Manmohan Singh (2004–2014)
Amendments: 92nd to 99th
Key Highlights:
97th Amendment (2011): Recognized cooperative societies in the Constitution.
99th Amendment (2014): Introduced the National Judicial Appointments Commission (later struck down).
Narendra Modi (2014–Present)
Amendments: 100th to 105th
Key Highlights:
101st Amendment (2016): Introduced Goods and Services Tax (GST).
105th Amendment (2021): Restored states’ rights to identify socially and educationally backward classes.
106th Amendment (2023): Reservation for women in Parliament and state assemblies.
Each amendment reflects the priorities and challenges faced by governments during their tenure.
Seven amendments were carried out under different regimes related to extension of reservation for SC/ ST like in 8th amendment in 1960, 23rd in 1969, 45thin 1980, 62nd in 1989, 79th in 1999, 95th in 2010 and 104th amendment in 2020 extending reservation for SC/ST for ten years in every such amendment.
The amendments in the constitution have been a continuous process since its enforcement with the changing situation like due to the introduction of technology. It is believed very first amendment in our constitution was on the basis on observations made by the Supreme Court while hearing some cases related to fundamental rights.
It may be mentioned Mehr Chand Mahajan’s tenure as a judge of Supreme Court of India from 1948 to 1954 and later as Chief Justice of India from January 4, 1954 to December 22, 1954 was marked by several landmark judgments that have had a lasting impact on Indian jurisprudence.
One of his most notable contributions was his focus on upholding fundamental rights. As a judge, he frequently emphasized the importance of balancing individual freedoms with societal welfare. His judgments often highlighted the principles of equity, justice, and good conscience, making him a key figure in shaping India’s post-independence legal framework.
One of his most impactful judgments was in State of Madras v. Champakam Dorairajan (1951).
This case dealt with the issue of caste-based reservations in educational institution ll. Champakam Dorairajan, a Brahmin woman, challenged the State of Madras’ order that reserved seats in government colleges on the basis of caste, which restricted her admission opportunities.
Judgment
The Supreme Court, with Mehr Chand Mahajan as part of the bench, struck down this reservation order, ruling that it violated Article 15(1) of the Indian Constitution, which prohibits discrimination on grounds of religion, race, caste, sex, or place of birth. This judgment reaffirmed the constitutional principle of equality and ensured that no discriminatory practices could override fundamental rights. The judgment also exposed the need for affirmative action to uplift historically disadvantaged communities, leading to the First Amendment of the Indian Constitution (1951), which added Article 15(4), enabling the State to make special provisions for the advancement of socially and educationally backward classes.
In another landmark judgment in a case regarding freedom of speech –Brij Bhushan vs State of Delhi (1950). The case revolved around the pre-censorship order issued by the Delhi government against the magazine organizer. The magazine challenged the restriction, claiming it infringed on their fundamental right to freedom and expression under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian constitution. The Supreme Court struck down the pre-censorship order as unconstitutional, ruling that such restrictions were not in line with Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution and could not be justified under the reasonable restrictions provided in Article 19(2). The judgment was among the first to uphold freedom of speech as a fundamental right ensuring the autonomy and independence of the press in a democratic set up.
While celebrating our constitution, the pious document for every Indian, it is time whatever commitments and guarantees have been given to Indian citizens are strictly enforced and implemented. How can an ordinary citizen feel safe, enjoy freedom of speech and expression, have access to livelihood, good education and healthcare are some of the issues though guaranteed by the founding fathers of the constitution which need strict compliance from We, the people of India, which include the state also.
(For awareness purpose only)Public speakers can use this.
Vandalism of Dr BR Ambedkar's statue in Amritsar on Republic Day sparks outrage
Yudhvir Rana / TNN / Updated: Jan 27, 2025, 11:03 IST
AMRITSAR: A person vandalised the life-size statue of Dr BR Ambedkar by climbing atop it, striking it with a hammer, and attempting to damage the Constitution book sculpture placed beside the statue.
The incident occurred on Republic Day when an extension ladder had been placed to garland the statue of the 'Father of the Indian Constitution,' located on Heritage Street.
The person, later identified as Akashdeep Singh, a resident of Moga, climbed the statue and vandalised it by striking it multiple times with a hammer.He also damaged the Constitution book, which is an integral part of the statue.During the incident, there was considerable activity on Heritage Street.
When people saw the young man vandalising the statue, they urged him to come down. Initially, he argued with them and refused to descend, but eventually, he agreed and dropped the hammer.He was later apprehended by the security staff and handed over to the police. It is not clear how the person obtained the hammer used to damage the sculpture or his intentions behind the act.As the youth was being escorted to the police station, someone from the crowd slapped him.
Following this, the security guards managed to pull him away from the crowd and took him to the police station.Meanwhile, the incident has drawn widespread condemnation. Lok Sabha Member of Parliament Gurjit Aujla expressed that it is because of Dr Ambedkar that India was granted the right to equality.He called for immediate intervention from the Punjab government, given the gravity of the situation, and demanded a thorough investigation into the matter.
While condemning the incident, former Punjab chief minister Sukhbir Singh Badal said that this is a heinous act that has hurt the sentiments of millions.“I demand stern action against the culprit and a thorough inquiry to unravel the conspiracy behind this shameful incident. Let’s stand united against such vile attempts to create divisions in our society,” said he.
Chennai: Tamil Nadu Governor R N Ravi said he would be happy to see the day when the state got a dalit chief minister. He said he was shocked to find the number of (sub) castes in the dalit category had increased compared to the past when there were fewer numbers.Speaking at the 135th birth anniversary of Sri La Sri A S Swami Sahajanadhar Adigalar in Chidambaram in Cuddalore district on Monday, he said he was shocked to find there were 200 dalit communities when he first came to TN, with the numbers having increased. He expressed his desire "to see the day when we have a dalit chief minister and a dalit scientist in ISRO."It is a mission to empower society, dalits slowly walk with their heads held high, along with others or ahead of others when the nation celebrated its 100th Independence Day, he said."We should remain culturally rooted, socially cohesive, and educationally progressed," he said. There were "two external forces very aggressively acting against our society, trying to destroy our culture, civilization, and dharma". The governor noted, "One force said our gods were bad, and this force was led by Karl Marx. Another external force (referring to British missionaries) said your gods are bad, they are satans, come worship our god, he will give a solution to your problems."The governor went on to add, "The third force came in after Independence, saying we have our own god, we will give you social justice, we will give you equality." He said the dalit community was the most oppressed in the country, "more so in our state". He mentioned visiting Kilvenmani, where 48 dalits were killed 56 years ago, and "people continued to suffer the same plight". He said, "Atrocities are committed against dalits in our state day in and day out."He said it was now a fashion to talk about Vaikom. The situation in Vaikom in Kerala was equally bad, but there is no discrimination in Kerala now, due to social revolution by Narayana Guru, he said. "Politics cannot solve it, it only divides. A person from the Ezhava community was the proud CM of that state. In south, the Nadars, who were once oppressed, progressed while keeping their cultural values intact," he added.
8
PUNJAB...Jalandhar/ Dalit Community Block Jalandhar Ludhiana Highway To Protest Against Ambedkar Statue Vandalism
Dalit community block Jalandhar-Ludhiana highway to protest against Ambedkar statue vandalism
Several markets in Ludhiana shut after call for bandh
Dalit community blocked the Jalandhar-Ludhiana national highway near the Jalandhar bypass in Ludhiana against vandalism of Dr BR Ambedkar's statue in Ludhiana on Tuesday. Tribune photo: Himanshu Mahajan
Advertisement
The Dalit community on Tuesday blocked the Jalandhar bypass in Ludhiana to protest against the vandalism of the statue of Dr BR Ambedkar in Amritsar.
Protesters from the community gathered in large numbers on the Jalandhar-Ludhiana national highway.
Advertisement
The development came after a call for bandh issued by Dalit leaders yesterday.
The impact of the bandh was also seen in several markets in Ludhiana. Prominent markets in old city areas like Chaura Bazaar, Bhadaur House, Railway road, Mata Rani Chowk, and Clock Tower were closed.
A large number of commuters were stranded on the national highway due to the protest. A long queue of vehicles was observed on the highway.
Advertisement
Meanwhile, in Jalandhar, almost all markets, private offices and educational institutions remained shut. Major intersections of the city, including Rama Mandi, Nakodar Chowk and Pathankot Chowk, were blocked by protestors led by Ravidassia and Valmik leaders.
The District Bar Association had also called for ‘no work day’ today in support of the bandh.
However, government schools and offices remained open.
The support for bandh had been announced by Congress MLA from Adampur Sukhwinder Kotli, who went to Amritsar today to visit the site where vandalism of the statue of Dr BR Ambedkar had taken place. BJP leaders, including ex-MP Sushil Rinku and ex-MLA KD Bhandari, also held a silent protest at Ambedkar Chowk to express solidarity on the issue.
9.
Dalit man’s in-laws, friend booked over his ‘honour killing’ in Telangana’s Suryapet
The man’s father said his son was killed because of his inter-caste marriage six months ago.
Krishna, 32, who belonged to the Scheduled Caste (SC) Mala community, was found dead on the banks of a canal on the River Musi near Pillalamarri Monday morning. (Express Photo)
Hours after a Dalit man was found dead on the banks of a canal on the River Musi in Telangana’s Suryapet district, the police late Monday booked four people, including his father- and brothers-in-law, based on a complaint by his father.
Story continues below this ad
Krishna, 32, who belonged to the Scheduled Caste (SC) Mala community, was found dead on the banks of a canal on the River Musi near Pillalamarri Monday morning.
The Suryapet police booked his wife Kotla Bhargavi’s father Kotla Saidulu, her brothers Kotla Naveen and Kotla Vamshee, and their friend Bairu Mahesh, based on a complaint from his father David alleging “honour killing” of his son by his daughter-in-law’s family. The four men were booked under sections 103(1),61(2),r/w 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Story continues below this ad
In his complaint, David, a church pastor, said the accused, who belong to the Backward Classes (BC)’s Goud community, conspired and murdered his son. He cited Krishna’s inter-caste marriage with Bhargavi six months ago as the reason for the accused holding a grudge against his son.
“Bhargavi and David are alleging that Saidulu, Naveen, and Vamshi are behind Krishna’s murder. There are two attempted murder cases against Krishna in Suryapet town police station and four similar cases against Naveen too. We are investigating all angles. We will arrest the culprits soon. The four suspects are absconding,” N Balu Naik, Sub-inspector, Suryapet Rural police station, told indianexpress.com
Naik said Krishna and Naveen were friends, and Krishna had been in love with Naveen’s sister, Bhargavi. Despite opposition from Naveen’s family, the couple went ahead with the marriage even as Bhargavi’s family was looking for a groom for her. Bhargavi and Krishna had been living at Krishna’s home in Mammillagadda for the last six months after their marriage, said Naik.
On Sunday evening, their mutual friend Bairu Mahesh called Krishna and he left home without sharing any details with his wife.
🍭🍭🍭🍭🍭🍭🍭🍭🍭🍭 *BENEFITS OF MEDITATION* 🌳😇🌅 🔵 *Why to meditate?* 🔵 *What is power of meditation?* 🔵 *Why to do group sadhana?* 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻 😇😇😇 *When 100 people do meditation together then its vibrations spread to a region of 5 kilometers around it and the negativity in this area is destroyed.* *🍀:^:^:🌹:^:^:🍀* 😇😇😇 *Eienstien had scientifically explained how if we break 1 atom , it breaks all other atoms around it- called an atomic explosion.* *🍀:^:^:🌹:^:^:🍀* 😇😇😇 *Our Rishis and Munis had said the same thing thousands of years ago – that is even 4% of the people on this planet do meditation that the rest 96% will also automatically come in bliss.* *🍀:^:^:🌹:^:^:🍀* 😇😇😇 *You can also observe a tremendous change in ...
Sivaji.UT news.Chief,kadapa.AP. In India There are 143 reserved MPs and 62 SC.STs won in general seats.143(reserved seats)+62(general seats)=205..sc.st out of 543..Lok Sabha MPs.38%.Dr Ambedkar is winning slowly in Dr Ambedkar India....good. GOOD NEWS. The facts from EC.website.SC.ST.. 20%(19.7) are elected in General Seats merritoriously. Dalit,SC.ST candidates in general seats rarely win. 🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘🐘 ALL INDIA LEVEL ✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️ In all India level Overall, since 2004, 5,953 SC/ST candidates have contested from (general seats ) unreserved seats in Lok Sabha elections, with 62 (or just over 1%) of them winning. In state Assembly elections, the number is almost similar, at 20,644 such candidates, and 246 recorded wins (1.19%). Lok Sabha elections Since 2004, the highest number of SC/ST winners in general seats were seen in 2024 last year’s Lok Sabha elections, at 22 (two of them women) – though, their number h...
Rising Kashmir > Celebrating Republic Day: We, the People of Bharat
Tamilnadu.
Comments
Post a Comment