03.12.2025.Sivaji's..Untouchables News of India.by UTN.Team Sivaji.9444917060.follow us in all Social Media.
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
๐ธ๐พ๐ธ๐พ๐ธ๐พ๐ธ๐พ๐ธ๐พ๐ธ
*_๐ผMessage for youth๐ผ_*
"๐ป✨True service is always free from expectations"
๐พPoints to think about:๐พ
When we see others in need, it is natural for us to help them. At that moment we do not expect anything in return from them. When we need help or support, we expect help from those we have helped. When they don't offer help in return, we may feel hurt or disappointed.
๐พProcedure:๐พ
When I help others, I need to remind myself that I should not expect anything in return. Any help I give will be returned to me in due course. The seeds that I have sown will not be wasted, but in due time they will bear fruit.
๐ธ๐พ๐ธ๐พ๐ธ๐พ๐ธ๐พ๐ธ๐พ
Allahabad- In a sweeping directive that could reshape scrutiny over Scheduled Caste (SC) and Scheduled Tribe (ST) benefit claims across Uttar Pradesh, the Allahabad High Court has ordered all District Magistrates in the state to investigate potential misuse of reservation benefits by individuals who have undergone religious conversion, completing the process within four months.
The court mandated that these officials report their findings to the Chief Secretary and other principal/additional chief secretaries to prevent "fraud on the Constitution," as observed by the Supreme Court in the landmark C. Selvarani case. The directives were issued on November 21 by Justice Praveen Kumar Giri in a case involving alleged religious conversion and communal discord in Maharajganj district.
The directive stems from a petition filed by Jitendra Sahani under Section 482 CrPC, seeking to quash criminal proceedings against him, registered at Sinduriya Police Station under Sections 153A (promoting enmity between groups on grounds of religion) and 295A (deliberate acts intended to outrage religious feelings) of the Indian Penal Code. Sahani, a resident of Mathaniya village in Maharajganj, had initially obtained permission from the Sub-Divisional Magistrate on April 3, 2023, to organize prayer meetings on his private land, focusing on preaching the teachings of Jesus Christ to diverse audiences without discrimination.
However, local tensions escalated, leading to the revocation of this permission on May 3, 2023, amid complaints from the Hindu community. A follow-up order dated December 10, 2023, accused Sahani of erecting a tent at the public Baluahi Dhus Chauraha to host large gatherings aimed at converting Hindus to Christianity, thereby threatening law and order. Following an investigation, a charge sheet was filed on March 11, 2024, and a summoning order issued on July 24, 2024, by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate.
Sahani's counsel, Patsy David and Vandana Henry, argued in the petition that the prayer meetings were peaceful, with no evidence of inflammatory rhetoric, and that witnesses had failed to support the FIR's allegations. They urged the court to annul the charge sheet and stay proceedings to prevent irreparable harm. Countering this, Additional Government Advocate Pankaj Tripathi highlighted the Uttar Pradesh government's sanction under Section 196(1) CrPC, granted via a March 11, order, to prosecute under the invoked IPC sections. He relied heavily on the Section 161 CrPC statement of witness Lakshman Vishwakarma, a 53-year-old local resident, who alleged that Sahani previously a Hindu from the Sahni community had converted to Christianity and assumed the role of a priest.
Vishwakarma's testimony painted a picture of derogatory remarks against Hindu deities, claiming Sahani mocked the faith by ridiculing its pantheon: "He says Hinduism has thousands of gods with eight arms, four limbs, five faces, riding pigs, offering mice as prasad... Some drink bhang, others liquor—this ridicules Hindu beliefs and fosters enmity among communities." The court noted that while such statements are not admissible as evidence, they could be used for contradiction during trial, refusing to intervene at this pre-trial stage.
Sivaji.UT news.Chief,kadapa.AP. In India There are 143 reserved MPs and 62 SC.STs won in general seats.143(reserved seats)+62(general seats)=205..sc.st out of 543..Lok Sabha MPs.38%.Dr Ambedkar is winning slowly in Dr Ambedkar India....good. GOOD NEWS. The facts from EC.website.SC.ST.. 20%(19.7) are elected in General Seats merritoriously. Dalit,SC.ST candidates in general seats rarely win. ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ALL INDIA LEVEL ✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️✈️ In all India level Overall, since 2004, 5,953 SC/ST candidates have contested from (general seats ) unreserved seats in Lok Sabha elections, with 62 (or just over 1%) of them winning. In state Assembly elections, the number is almost similar, at 20,644 such candidates, and 246 recorded wins (1.19%). Lok Sabha elections Since 2004, the highest number of SC/ST winners in general seats were seen in 2024 last year’s Lok Sabha elections, at 22 (two of them women) – though, their number h...
Sivaji Ayyayi r kiam. UT News. The creamy layer concept, which excludes economically advanced individuals from reservation benefits, currently applies only to Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in India (typically those with family income above ₹8 lakh per year). It does not apply to Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) reservations. Supreme Court Observations (August 2024) In a landmark 6:1 majority judgment in State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh (1 August 2024), a seven-judge Constitution Bench allowed states to sub-classify SC/ST groups to provide more targeted quotas to the most disadvantaged sub-groups. Several judges (including Justices B.R. Gavai, Vikram Nath, and others) observed that states should identify and exclude a "creamy layer" (socially/economically advanced sections) within SC/ST from reservation benefits, arguing this would ensure benefits reach the truly needy and achieve "real equality." They suggested criteria for SC/ST creamy ...
Comments
Post a Comment